Debian: DSA-3414-1: xen security update

    Date09 Dec 2015
    CategoryDebian
    103
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    Multiple security issues have been found in the Xen virtualisation solution, which may result in denial of service or information disclosure.
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA256
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-3414-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.debian.org/security/                       Moritz Muehlenhoff
    December 09, 2015                     https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : xen
    CVE ID         : CVE-2015-3259 CVE-2015-3340 CVE-2015-5307 CVE-2015-6654 
                     CVE-2015-7311 CVE-2015-7812 CVE-2015-7813 CVE-2015-7814
                     CVE-2015-7969 CVE-2015-7970 CVE-2015-7971 CVE-2015-7972
                     CVE-2015-8104
    
    Multiple security issues have been found in the Xen virtualisation
    solution, which may result in denial of service or information
    disclosure.
    
    For the oldstable distribution (wheezy), an update will be provided
    later.
    
    For the stable distribution (jessie), these problems have been fixed in
    version 4.4.1-9+deb8u3.
    
    For the unstable distribution (sid), these problems will be fixed soon.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your xen packages.
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"64","type":"x","order":"1","pct":57.14,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"15","type":"x","order":"2","pct":13.39,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"33","type":"x","order":"3","pct":29.46,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.