Debian: DSA-3431-2: ganeti regression update

    Date14 Jan 2016
    CategoryDebian
    110
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    The update for ganeti issued as DSA-3431-1 causes the gnt-instance info command to fail for all instances of type DRBD. Updated packages are now available to address this regression. For reference the original advisory text follows.
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-3431-2                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.debian.org/security/                     Salvatore Bonaccorso
    January 14, 2016                      https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : ganeti
    Debian Bug     : 810850
    
    The update for ganeti issued as DSA-3431-1 causes the gnt-instance info
    command to fail for all instances of type DRBD. Updated packages are now
    available to address this regression. For reference the original
    advisory text follows.
    
    Pierre Kim discovered two vulnerabilities in the restful API of Ganeti,
    a virtual server cluster management tool. SSL parameter negotiation
    could result in denial of service and the DRBD secret could leak.
    
    For the oldstable distribution (wheezy), this problem has been fixed
    in version 2.5.2-1+deb7u2.
    
    For the stable distribution (jessie), this problem has been fixed in
    version 2.12.4-1+deb8u3.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your ganeti packages.
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"64","type":"x","order":"1","pct":57.14,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"15","type":"x","order":"2","pct":13.39,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"33","type":"x","order":"3","pct":29.46,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.