Debian: DSA-3492-2: gajim regression update

    Date28 Feb 2016
    CategoryDebian
    43
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    The wheezy part of the previous gajim update, DSA-3492-1, was incorrectly built resulting in an unsatisfiable dependency. This update corrects that problem. For reference, the original advisory text follows.
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-3492-2                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.debian.org/security/                     Salvatore Bonaccorso
    February 28, 2016                     https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : gajim
    Debian Bug     : 816158
    
    The wheezy part of the previous gajim update, DSA-3492-1, was
    incorrectly built resulting in an unsatisfiable dependency. This update
    corrects that problem. For reference, the original advisory text
    follows.
    
    Daniel Gultsch discovered a vulnerability in Gajim, an XMPP/jabber
    client. Gajim didn't verify the origin of roster update, allowing an
    attacker to spoof them and potentially allowing her to intercept
    messages.
    
    For the oldstable distribution (wheezy), this problem has been fixed
    in version 0.15.1-4.1+deb7u2.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your gajim packages.
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    Do you read our distribution advisories on a regular basis?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /component/communitypolls/?task=poll.vote&format=json
    23
    radio
    [{"id":"84","title":"Yes, for a single distribution","votes":"0","type":"x","order":"1","pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":"85","title":"Yes, for multiple distributions","votes":"6","type":"x","order":"2","pct":60,"resources":[]},{"id":"86","title":"No","votes":"4","type":"x","order":"3","pct":40,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.