Debian: DSA-3513-1: chromium-browser security update

    Date10 Mar 2016
    CategoryDebian
    30
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    Several vulnerabilities have been discovered in the chromium web browser. CVE-2016-1643
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-3513-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.debian.org/security/                          Michael Gilbert
    March 10, 2016                        https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : chromium-browser
    CVE ID         : CVE-2016-1643 CVE-2016-1644 CVE-2016-1645
    
    Several vulnerabilities have been discovered in the chromium web browser.
    
    CVE-2016-1643
    
        cloudfuzzer discovered a type confusion issue in Blink/Webkit.
    
    CVE-2016-1644
    
        Atte Kettunen discovered a use-after-free issue in Blink/Webkit.
    
    CVE-2016-1645
    
        An out-of-bounds write issue was discovered in the pdfium library.
    
    For the stable distribution (jessie), these problems have been fixed in
    version 49.0.2623.87-1~deb8u1.
    
    For the testing distribution (stretch), these problems will be fixed soon.
    
    For the unstable distribution (sid), these problems have been fixed in
    version 49.0.2623.87-1.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your chromium-browser packages.
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"4","type":"x","order":"1","pct":57.14,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"2","type":"x","order":"2","pct":28.57,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"1","type":"x","order":"3","pct":14.29,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    Advisories

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.