Debian: DSA-3559-1: iceweasel security update

    Date27 Apr 2016
    CategoryDebian
    57
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    Multiple security issues have been found in Iceweasel, Debian's version of the Mozilla Firefox web browser: Multiple memory safety errors and buffer overflows may lead to the execution of arbitrary code or denial of service.
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA256
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-3559-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.debian.org/security/                       Moritz Muehlenhoff
    April 27, 2016                        https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : iceweasel
    CVE ID         : CVE-2016-2805 CVE-2016-2807 CVE-2016-2808 CVE-2016-2814
    
    Multiple security issues have been found in Iceweasel, Debian's version
    of the Mozilla Firefox web browser: Multiple memory safety errors and
    buffer overflows may lead to the execution of arbitrary code or denial
    of service.
    
    For the oldstable distribution (wheezy), these problems have been fixed in
    version 38.8.0esr-1~deb7u1.
    
    For the stable distribution (jessie), these problems have been fixed in
    version 38.8.0esr-1~deb8u1.
    
    For the unstable distribution (sid), these problems have been fixed in
    version 45.1.0esr-1 of the firefox-esr source package and version
    46.0-1 of the firefox source package.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your iceweasel packages.
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"25","type":"x","order":"1","pct":54.35,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"5","type":"x","order":"2","pct":10.87,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"16","type":"x","order":"3","pct":34.78,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.