Debian: DSA-3864-1: fop security update

    Date27 May 2017
    CategoryDebian
    63
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    It was discovered that an XML external entities vulnerability in the Apache FOP XML formatter may result in information disclosure. For the stable distribution (jessie), this problem has been fixed in
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA256
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-3864-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.debian.org/security/                       Moritz Muehlenhoff
    May 27, 2017                          https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : fop
    CVE ID         : CVE-2017-5661
    
    It was discovered that an XML external entities vulnerability in the
    Apache FOP XML formatter may result in information disclosure.
    
    For the stable distribution (jessie), this problem has been fixed in
    version 1:1.1.dfsg2-1+deb8u1.
    
    For the upcoming stable distribution (stretch), this problem has been
    fixed in version 1:2.1-6.
    
    For the unstable distribution (sid), this problem has been fixed in
    version 1:2.1-6.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your fop packages.
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    Advisories

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"64","type":"x","order":"1","pct":57.14,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"15","type":"x","order":"2","pct":13.39,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"33","type":"x","order":"3","pct":29.46,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.