Debian: DSA-3879-1: libosip2 security update

    Date13 Jun 2017
    CategoryDebian
    59
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    Multiple security vulnerabilities have been found in oSIP, a library implementing the Session Initiation Protocol, which might result in denial of service through malformed SIP messages.
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA256
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-3879-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.debian.org/security/                       Moritz Muehlenhoff
    June 13, 2017                         https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : libosip2
    CVE ID         : CVE-2016-10324 CVE-2016-10325 CVE-2016-10326 CVE-2017-7853
    
    Multiple security vulnerabilities have been found in oSIP, a library
    implementing the Session Initiation Protocol, which might result in
    denial of service through malformed SIP messages.
    
    For the stable distribution (jessie), these problems have been fixed in
    version 4.1.0-2+deb8u1.
    
    For the upcoming stable distribution (stretch), these problems have been
    fixed in version 4.1.0-2.1.
    
    For the unstable distribution (sid), these problems have been fixed in
    version 4.1.0-2.1.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your libosip2 packages.
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"5","type":"x","order":"1","pct":55.56,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"3","type":"x","order":"2","pct":33.33,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"1","type":"x","order":"3","pct":11.11,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    Advisories

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.