Debian: DSA-3928-2: firefox-esr security update

    Date16 Aug 2017
    CategoryDebian
    84
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    The update shipped in DSA 3928-1 failed to build on the mips, mipsel and powerpc architectures for the oldstable distribution (jessie). This has been fixed in 52.3.0esr-1~deb8u2.
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA256
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-3928-2                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.debian.org/security/                       Moritz Muehlenhoff
    August 16, 2017                       https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : firefox-esr
    CVE ID         : CVE-2017-7753 CVE-2017-7779 CVE-2017-7784 CVE-2017-7785 
                     CVE-2017-7786 CVE-2017-7787 CVE-2017-7791 CVE-2017-7792 
                     CVE-2017-7798 CVE-2017-7800 CVE-2017-7801 CVE-2017-7802 
                     CVE-2017-7803 CVE-2017-7807 CVE-2017-7809
    
    The update shipped in DSA 3928-1 failed to build on the mips, mipsel
    and powerpc architectures for the oldstable distribution (jessie).
    This has been fixed in 52.3.0esr-1~deb8u2.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your firefox-esr packages.
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"39","type":"x","order":"1","pct":50.65,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"11","type":"x","order":"2","pct":14.29,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"27","type":"x","order":"3","pct":35.06,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.