Debian: DSA-3953-1: aodh security update

    Date23 Aug 2017
    CategoryDebian
    84
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    Zane Bitter from Red Hat discovered a vulnerability in Aodh, the alarm engine for OpenStack. Aodh does not verify that the user creating the alarm is the trustor or has the same rights as the trustor, nor that the trust is for the same project as the alarm. The bug allows that an
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-3953-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.debian.org/security/                            Luciano Bello
    August 23, 2017                       https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : aodh
    CVE ID         : CVE-2017-12440
    Debian Bug     : 872605
    
    Zane Bitter from Red Hat discovered a vulnerability in Aodh, the alarm
    engine for OpenStack. Aodh does not verify that the user creating the
    alarm is the trustor or has the same rights as the trustor, nor that the
    trust is for the same project as the alarm. The bug allows that an
    authenticated users without a Keystone token with knowledge of trust IDs
    to perform unspecified authenticated actions by adding alarm actions.
    
    For the stable distribution (stretch), this problem has been fixed in
    version 3.0.0-4+deb9u1.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your aodh packages.
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    Advisories

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"64","type":"x","order":"1","pct":57.14,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"15","type":"x","order":"2","pct":13.39,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"33","type":"x","order":"3","pct":29.46,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.