Debian: DSA-3996-1: ffmpeg security update

    Date10 Oct 2017
    CategoryDebian
    84
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    Several vulnerabilities have been discovered in the FFmpeg multimedia framework, which could result in denial of service or potentially the execution of arbitrary code if malformed Real, MV, RL2, ASF, Apple HLS, Phantom Cine, MXF, NSV, MOV or RTP H.264 files/streams are processed.
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA512
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-3996-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.debian.org/security/                       Moritz Muehlenhoff
    October 10, 2017                      https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : ffmpeg
    CVE ID         : CVE-2017-14054 CVE-2017-14055 CVE-2017-14056
                     CVE-2017-14057 CVE-2017-14058 CVE-2017-14059
    		 CVE-2017-14169 CVE-2017-14170 CVE-2017-14171
    		 CVE-2017-14222 CVE-2017-14223 CVE-2017-14225 
                     CVE-2017-14767
    
    Several vulnerabilities have been discovered in the FFmpeg multimedia
    framework, which could result in denial of service or potentially the
    execution of arbitrary code if malformed Real, MV, RL2, ASF, Apple HLS,
    Phantom Cine, MXF, NSV, MOV or RTP H.264 files/streams are processed.
    
    For the stable distribution (stretch), these problems have been fixed in
    version 7:3.2.8-1~deb9u1.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your ffmpeg packages.
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"24","type":"x","order":"1","pct":54.55,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"5","type":"x","order":"2","pct":11.36,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"15","type":"x","order":"3","pct":34.09,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.