Debian: DSA-4006-2: mupdf security update

    Date10 Nov 2017
    CategoryDebian
    78
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    It was discovered that the original patch applied for CVE-2017-15587 in DSA-4006-1 was incomplete. Updated packages are now available to address this problem. For reference, the relevant part of the original advisory text follows.
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-4006-2                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.debian.org/security/                                         
    November 10, 2017                     https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : mupdf
    CVE ID         : CVE-2017-15587
    Debian Bug     : 879055
    
    It was discovered that the original patch applied for CVE-2017-15587
    in DSA-4006-1 was incomplete. Updated packages are now available to
    address this problem. For reference, the relevant part of the original
    advisory text follows.
    
    CVE-2017-15587
    
        Terry Chia and Jeremy Heng discovered an integer overflow that can
        cause arbitrary code execution via a crafted .pdf file.
    
    For the oldstable distribution (jessie), this problem has been fixed
    in version 1.5-1+deb8u3.
    
    For the stable distribution (stretch), this problem have been fixed in
    version 1.9a+ds1-4+deb9u2.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your mupdf packages.
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"25","type":"x","order":"1","pct":54.35,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"5","type":"x","order":"2","pct":10.87,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"16","type":"x","order":"3","pct":34.78,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.