Debian: DSA-4032-1: imagemagick security update

    Date12 Nov 2017
    CategoryDebian
    59
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    This update fixes several vulnerabilities in imagemagick: Various memory handling problems and cases of missing or incomplete input sanitising may result in denial of service, memory disclosure or the execution of arbitrary code if malformed GIF, TTF, SVG, TIFF, PCX, JPG or SFW files
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA512
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-4032-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.debian.org/security/                       Moritz Muehlenhoff
    November 12, 2017                     https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : imagemagick
    CVE ID         : CVE-2017-12983 CVE-2017-13134 CVE-2017-13758
                     CVE-2017-13769 CVE-2017-14224 CVE-2017-14607
    		 CVE-2017-14682 CVE-2017-14989 CVE-2017-15277
    Debian Bug     : 873134 873099 878508 878507 876097 878527 876488 878562
                     878578
    
    This update fixes several vulnerabilities in imagemagick: Various memory
    handling problems and cases of missing or incomplete input sanitising
    may result in denial of service, memory disclosure or the execution of
    arbitrary code if malformed GIF, TTF, SVG, TIFF, PCX, JPG or SFW files
    are processed.
    
    For the stable distribution (stretch), these problems have been fixed in
    version 8:6.9.7.4+dfsg-11+deb9u3.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your imagemagick packages.
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"5","type":"x","order":"1","pct":55.56,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"3","type":"x","order":"2","pct":33.33,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"1","type":"x","order":"3","pct":11.11,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    Advisories

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.