Debian: DSA-4040-1: imagemagick security update

    Date17 Nov 2017
    CategoryDebian
    96
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    This update fixes several vulnerabilities in imagemagick: Various memory handling problems and cases of missing or incomplete input sanitising may result in denial of service, memory disclosure or the execution of arbitrary code if malformed image files are processed.
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA512
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-4040-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.debian.org/security/                       Moritz Muehlenhoff
    November 17, 2017                     https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : imagemagick
    CVE ID         : CVE-2017-11352 CVE-2017-11640 CVE-2017-12431
                     CVE-2017-12640 CVE-2017-12877 CVE-2017-12983
    		 CVE-2017-13134 CVE-2017-13139 CVE-2017-13144
    		 CVE-2017-13758 CVE-2017-13769 CVE-2017-14224 
                     CVE-2017-14607 CVE-2017-14682 CVE-2017-14989
    		 CVE-2017-15277 CVE-2017-16546
    
    This update fixes several vulnerabilities in imagemagick: Various memory
    handling problems and cases of missing or incomplete input sanitising
    may result in denial of service, memory disclosure or the execution of
    arbitrary code if malformed image files are processed.
    
    For the oldstable distribution (jessie), these problems have been fixed
    in version 8:6.8.9.9-5+deb8u11.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your imagemagick packages.
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"25","type":"x","order":"1","pct":54.35,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"5","type":"x","order":"2","pct":10.87,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"16","type":"x","order":"3","pct":34.78,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.