Debian: DSA-4139-1: firefox-esr security update

    Date15 Mar 2018
    CategoryDebian
    5668
    Posted ByAnthony Pell
    Several security issues have been found in the Mozilla Firefox web browser: Multiple memory safety errors and other implementation errors may lead to the execution of arbitrary code, denial of service or information disclosure.
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA512
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-4139-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.debian.org/security/                       Moritz Muehlenhoff
    March 15, 2018                        https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : firefox-esr
    CVE ID         : CVE-2018-5125 CVE-2018-5127 CVE-2018-5129 CVE-2018-5130 
                     CVE-2018-5131 CVE-2018-5144 CVE-2018-5145
    
    Several security issues have been found in the Mozilla Firefox web
    browser: Multiple memory safety errors and other implementation errors
    may lead to the execution of arbitrary code, denial of service or
    information disclosure.
    		       
    For the oldstable distribution (jessie), these problems have been fixed
    in version 52.7.1esr-1~deb8u1.
    
    For the stable distribution (stretch), these problems have been fixed in
    version 52.7.1esr-1~deb9u1.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your firefox-esr packages.
    
    For the detailed security status of firefox-esr please refer to
    its security tracker page at:
    https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/firefox-esr
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"4","type":"x","order":"1","pct":57.14,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"2","type":"x","order":"2","pct":28.57,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"1","type":"x","order":"3","pct":14.29,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    Advisories

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.