Debian: DSA-4148-1: kamailio security update

    Date22 Mar 2018
    CategoryDebian
    4436
    Posted ByAnthony Pell
    Alfred Farrugia and Sandro Gauci discovered an off-by-one heap overflow in the Kamailio SIP server which could result in denial of service and potentially the execution of arbitrary code.
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA512
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-4148-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.debian.org/security/                       Moritz Muehlenhoff
    March 22, 2018                        https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : kamailio
    CVE ID         : CVE-2018-8828
    
    Alfred Farrugia and Sandro Gauci discovered an off-by-one heap overflow
    in the Kamailio SIP server which could result in denial of service and
    potentially the execution of arbitrary code.
    
    For the oldstable distribution (jessie), this problem has been fixed
    in version 4.2.0-2+deb8u3.
    
    For the stable distribution (stretch), this problem has been fixed in
    version 4.4.4-2+deb9u1.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your kamailio packages.
    
    For the detailed security status of kamailio please refer to
    its security tracker page at:
    https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/kamailio
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"23","type":"x","order":"1","pct":56.1,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"5","type":"x","order":"2","pct":12.2,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"13","type":"x","order":"3","pct":31.71,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.