Debian: DSA-4170-1: pjproject security update

    Date09 Apr 2018
    CategoryDebian
    1034
    Posted ByAnthony Pell
    Multiple vulnerabilities have been discovered in the PJSIP/PJProject multimedia communication which may result in denial of service during the processing of SIP and SDP messages and ioqueue keys.
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA512
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-4170-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.debian.org/security/                       Moritz Muehlenhoff
    April 09, 2018                        https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : pjproject
    CVE ID         : CVE-2017-16872 CVE-2017-16875 CVE-2018-1000098
                     CVE-2018-1000099
    
    Multiple vulnerabilities have been discovered in the PJSIP/PJProject
    multimedia communication which may result in denial of service during
    the processing of SIP and SDP messages and ioqueue keys.
    
    For the stable distribution (stretch), these problems have been fixed in
    version 2.5.5~dfsg-6+deb9u1.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your pjproject packages.
    
    For the detailed security status of pjproject please refer to
    its security tracker page at:
    https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/pjproject
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"8","type":"x","order":"1","pct":57.14,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"3","type":"x","order":"2","pct":21.43,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"3","type":"x","order":"3","pct":21.43,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.