Debian: DSA-4174-1: corosync security update

    Date17 Apr 2018
    CategoryDebian
    1693
    Posted ByAnthony Pell
    The Citrix Security Response Team discovered that corosync, a cluster engine implementation, allowed an unauthenticated user to cause a denial-of-service by application crash.
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-4174-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.debian.org/security/                       Sebastien Delafond
    April 17, 2018                        https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : corosync
    CVE ID         : CVE-2018-1084
    Debian Bug     : 895653
    
    The Citrix Security Response Team discovered that corosync, a cluster
    engine implementation, allowed an unauthenticated user to cause a
    denial-of-service by application crash.
    
    For the stable distribution (stretch), this problem has been fixed in
    version 2.4.2-3+deb9u1.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your corosync packages.
    
    For the detailed security status of corosync please refer to
    its security tracker page at:
    https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/corosync
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"8","type":"x","order":"1","pct":57.14,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"3","type":"x","order":"2","pct":21.43,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"3","type":"x","order":"3","pct":21.43,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.