Debian: DSA-4185-1: openjdk-8 security update

    Date28 Apr 2018
    CategoryDebian
    4072
    Posted ByAnthony Pell
    Several vulnerabilities have been discovered in OpenJDK, an implementation of the Oracle Java platform, resulting in denial of service, sandbox bypass, execution of arbitrary code or bypass of JAR signature validation.
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA512
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-4185-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.debian.org/security/                       Moritz Muehlenhoff
    April 28, 2018                        https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : openjdk-8
    CVE ID         : CVE-2018-2790 CVE-2018-2794 CVE-2018-2795 CVE-2018-2796
                     CVE-2018-2797 CVE-2018-2798 CVE-2018-2799 CVE-2018-2800
    		 CVE-2018-2814 CVE-2018-2815
    
    Several vulnerabilities have been discovered in OpenJDK, an
    implementation of the Oracle Java platform, resulting in denial of
    service, sandbox bypass, execution of arbitrary code or bypass of JAR
    signature validation.
    
    For the stable distribution (stretch), these problems have been fixed in
    version 8u171-b11-1~deb9u1.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your openjdk-8 packages.
    
    For the detailed security status of openjdk-8 please refer to
    its security tracker page at:
    https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/openjdk-8
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"14","type":"x","order":"1","pct":53.85,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"4","type":"x","order":"2","pct":15.38,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"8","type":"x","order":"3","pct":30.77,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.