Debian: DSA-4190-1: jackson-databind security update

    Date03 May 2018
    CategoryDebian
    4690
    Posted ByAnthony Pell
    It was discovered that jackson-databind, a Java library used to parse JSON and other data formats, improperly validated user input prior to deserializing because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2017-7525.
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-4190-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.debian.org/security/                       Sebastien Delafond
    May 03, 2018                          https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : jackson-databind
    CVE ID         : CVE-2018-7489
    Debian Bug     : 891614
    
    It was discovered that jackson-databind, a Java library used to parse
    JSON and other data formats, improperly validated user input prior to
    deserializing because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2017-7525.
    
    For the oldstable distribution (jessie), this problem has been fixed
    in version 2.4.2-2+deb8u4.
    
    For the stable distribution (stretch), this problem has been fixed in
    version 2.8.6-1+deb9u4.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your jackson-databind packages.
    
    For the detailed security status of jackson-databind please refer to
    its security tracker page at:
    https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/jackson-databind
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"25","type":"x","order":"1","pct":54.35,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"5","type":"x","order":"2","pct":10.87,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"16","type":"x","order":"3","pct":34.78,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.