Debian: DSA-4191-2: redmine regression update

    Date03 Jun 2018
    CategoryDebian
    4091
    Posted ByAnthony Pell
    The redmine security update announced as DSA-4191-1 caused regressions with multi-value fields while doing queries on project issues due to an bug in the patch to address CVE-2017-15569. Updated packages are now available to correct this issue.
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-4191-2                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.debian.org/security/                     Salvatore Bonaccorso
    June 03, 2018                         https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : redmine
    Debian Bug     : 900283
    
    The redmine security update announced as DSA-4191-1 caused regressions
    with multi-value fields while doing queries on project issues due to an
    bug in the patch to address CVE-2017-15569. Updated packages are now
    available to correct this issue.
    
    For the stable distribution (stretch), this problem has been fixed in
    version 3.3.1-4+deb9u2.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your redmine packages.
    
    For the detailed security status of redmine please refer to its security
    tracker page at:
    https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/redmine
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"13","type":"x","order":"1","pct":52,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"4","type":"x","order":"2","pct":16,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"8","type":"x","order":"3","pct":32,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.