Debian: DSA-4194-1: lucene-solr security update

    Date06 May 2018
    CategoryDebian
    5395
    Posted ByAnthony Pell
    An XML external entity expansion vulnerability was discovered in the DataImportHandler of Solr, a search server based on Lucene, which could result in information disclosure.
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA512
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-4194-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.debian.org/security/                       Moritz Muehlenhoff
    May 06, 2018                          https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : lucene-solr
    CVE ID         : CVE-2018-1308
    
    An XML external entity expansion vulnerability was discovered in the 
    DataImportHandler of Solr, a search server based on Lucene, which could
    result in information disclosure.
    
    For the oldstable distribution (jessie), this problem has been fixed
    in version 3.6.2+dfsg-5+deb8u2.
    
    For the stable distribution (stretch), this problem has been fixed in
    version 3.6.2+dfsg-10+deb9u2.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your lucene-solr packages.
    
    For the detailed security status of lucene-solr please refer to
    its security tracker page at:
    https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/lucene-solr
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"25","type":"x","order":"1","pct":54.35,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"5","type":"x","order":"2","pct":10.87,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"16","type":"x","order":"3","pct":34.78,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.