Debian: DSA-4204-1: imagemagick security update

    Date18 May 2018
    CategoryDebian
    5753
    Posted ByAnthony Pell
    This update fixes several vulnerabilities in imagemagick, a graphical software suite. Various memory handling problems or issues about incomplete input sanitizing would result in denial of service or memory disclosure.
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-4204-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.debian.org/security/                       Sebastien Delafond
    May 18, 2018                          https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : imagemagick
    CVE ID         : CVE-2017-10995 CVE-2017-11533 CVE-2017-11535 CVE-2017-11639 
                     CVE-2017-13143 CVE-2017-17504 CVE-2017-17879 CVE-2018-5248
    Debian Bug     : 867748 869827 869834 870012 870065 885125 885340 886588
    
    This update fixes several vulnerabilities in imagemagick, a graphical
    software suite. Various memory handling problems or issues about
    incomplete input sanitizing would result in denial of service or
    memory disclosure.
    
    For the oldstable distribution (jessie), these problems have been fixed
    in version 8:6.8.9.9-5+deb8u12.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your imagemagick packages.
    
    For the detailed security status of imagemagick please refer to
    its security tracker page at:
    https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/imagemagick
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"23","type":"x","order":"1","pct":56.1,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"5","type":"x","order":"2","pct":12.2,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"13","type":"x","order":"3","pct":31.71,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.