Debian: DSA-4232-1: xen security update

    Date20 Jun 2018
    CategoryDebian
    7460
    Posted ByAnthony Pell
    This update provides mitigations for the "lazy FPU" vulnerability affecting a range of Intel CPUs, which could result in leaking CPU register states belonging to another vCPU previously scheduled on the same CPU. For additional information please refer to
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA512
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-4232-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.debian.org/security/                       Moritz Muehlenhoff
    June 20, 2018                         https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : xen
    CVE ID         : CVE-2018-3665
    
    This update provides mitigations for the "lazy FPU" vulnerability
    affecting a range of Intel CPUs, which could result in leaking CPU
    register states belonging to another vCPU previously scheduled on the
    same CPU. For additional information please refer to
    https://xenbits.xen.org/xsa/advisory-267.html
    
    For the stable distribution (stretch), this problem has been fixed in
    version 4.8.3+xsa267+shim4.10.1+xsa267-1+deb9u8.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your xen packages.
    
    For the detailed security status of xen please refer to
    its security tracker page at:
    https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/xen
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"40","type":"x","order":"1","pct":48.78,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"13","type":"x","order":"2","pct":15.85,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"29","type":"x","order":"3","pct":35.37,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    Advisories

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.