Debian: DSA-4273-2: intel-microcode security update

    Date16 Sep 2018
    CategoryDebian
    2505
    Posted ByAnthony Pell
    This update ships updated CPU microcode for additional models of Intel CPUs which were not yet covered by the Intel microcode update released as DSA-4273-1 (and thus provides SSBD support (needed to address "Spectre v4") and fixes for "Spectre v3a")).
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA512
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-4273-2                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    	
    https://www.debian.org/security/                       Moritz Muehlenhoff
    September 16, 2018                    https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : intel-microcode
    CVE ID         : CVE-2018-3639 CVE-2018-3640
    
    This update ships updated CPU microcode for additional models of Intel
    CPUs which were not yet covered by the Intel microcode update released
    as DSA-4273-1 (and thus provides SSBD support (needed to address
    "Spectre v4") and fixes for "Spectre v3a")).
        
    For the stable distribution (stretch), these problems have been fixed in
    version 3.20180807a.1~deb9u1.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your intel-microcode packages.
    
    For the detailed security status of intel-microcode please refer to
    its security tracker page at:
    https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/intel-microcode
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"37","type":"x","order":"1","pct":51.39,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"10","type":"x","order":"2","pct":13.89,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"25","type":"x","order":"3","pct":34.72,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.