Debian: DSA-4307-1: python3.5 security update

    Date28 Sep 2018
    CategoryDebian
    4362
    Posted ByAnthony Pell
    Multiple security issues were discovered in Python: ElementTree failed to initialise Expat's hash salt, two denial of service issues were found in difflib and poplib and a buffer overflow in PyString_DecodeEscape.
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA512
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-4307-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.debian.org/security/                       Moritz Muehlenhoff
    September 28, 2018                    https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : python3.5
    CVE ID         : CVE-2017-1000158 CVE-2018-1060 CVE-2018-1061
                     CVE-2018-14647
    
    Multiple security issues were discovered in Python: ElementTree failed
    to initialise Expat's hash salt, two denial of service issues were found
    in difflib and poplib and a buffer overflow in PyString_DecodeEscape.
    
    For the stable distribution (stretch), these problems have been fixed in
    version 3.5.3-1+deb9u1.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your python3.5 packages.
    
    For the detailed security status of python3.5 please refer to
    its security tracker page at:
    https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/python3.5
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"25","type":"x","order":"1","pct":55.56,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"5","type":"x","order":"2","pct":11.11,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"15","type":"x","order":"3","pct":33.33,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.