Debian: DSA-4316-1: imagemagick security update

    Date12 Oct 2018
    CategoryDebian
    5611
    Posted ByAnthony Pell
    This update fixes several vulnerabilities in Imagemagick, a graphical software suite. Various memory handling problems or incomplete input sanitising have been found in the coders for BMP, DIB, PICT, DCM, CUT and PSD.
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA512
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-4316-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.debian.org/security/                       Moritz Muehlenhoff
    October 12, 2018                      https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : imagemagick
    CVE ID         : CVE-2018-16412 CVE-2018-16413 CVE-2018-16642 CVE-2018-16644 
                     CVE-2018-16645
    
    This update fixes several vulnerabilities in Imagemagick, a graphical
    software suite. Various memory handling problems or incomplete input
    sanitising have been found in the coders for BMP, DIB, PICT, DCM, CUT
    and PSD.
    
    For the stable distribution (stretch), these problems have been fixed in
    version 8:6.9.7.4+dfsg-11+deb9u6.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your imagemagick packages.
    
    For the detailed security status of imagemagick please refer to
    its security tracker page at:
    https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/imagemagick
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"40","type":"x","order":"1","pct":48.78,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"13","type":"x","order":"2","pct":15.85,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"29","type":"x","order":"3","pct":35.37,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.