Debian: DSA-4324-1: firefox-esr security update

    Date24 Oct 2018
    CategoryDebian
    4364
    Posted ByAnthony Pell
    Multiple security issues have been found in the Mozilla Firefox web browser, which could result in the execution of arbitrary code, privilege escalation or information disclosure.
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA512
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-4324-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.debian.org/security/                       Moritz Muehlenhoff
    October 24, 2018                      https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : firefox-esr
    CVE ID         : CVE-2018-12389 CVE-2018-12390 CVE-2018-12392
                     CVE-2018-12393 CVE-2018-12395 CVE-2018-12396
    		 CVE-2018-12397
    
    Multiple security issues have been found in the Mozilla Firefox web
    browser, which could result in the execution of arbitrary code,
    privilege escalation or information disclosure.
    
    For the stable distribution (stretch), these problems have been fixed in
    version 60.3.0esr-1~deb9u1.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your firefox-esr packages.
    
    For the detailed security status of firefox-esr please refer to
    its security tracker page at:
    https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/firefox-esr
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"8","type":"x","order":"1","pct":61.54,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"3","type":"x","order":"2","pct":23.08,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"2","type":"x","order":"3","pct":15.38,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.