Debian: DSA-4334-1: mupdf security update

    Date04 Nov 2018
    CategoryDebian
    8212
    Posted ByAnthony Pell
    Multiple vulnerabilities were discovered in MuPDF, a PDF, XPS, and e-book viewer which could result in denial of service or the execution of arbitrary code if malformed documents are opened.
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA512
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-4334-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.debian.org/security/                       Moritz Muehlenhoff
    November 04, 2018                     https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : mupdf
    CVE ID         : CVE-2017-17866 CVE-2018-5686 CVE-2018-6187 CVE-2018-6192 
                     CVE-2018-1000037 CVE-2018-1000040
    
    Multiple vulnerabilities were discovered in MuPDF, a PDF, XPS, and e-book
    viewer which could result in denial of service or the execution of
    arbitrary code if malformed documents are opened.
    	
    For the stable distribution (stretch), these problems have been fixed in
    version 1.9a+ds1-4+deb9u4.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your mupdf packages.
    
    For the detailed security status of mupdf please refer to
    its security tracker page at:
    https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/mupdf
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    Advisories

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"64","type":"x","order":"1","pct":57.14,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"15","type":"x","order":"2","pct":13.39,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"33","type":"x","order":"3","pct":29.46,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.