Debian: DSA-4339-2: ceph regression update

    Date21 Nov 2018
    CategoryDebian
    6232
    Posted ByAnthony Pell
    The update for ceph issued as DSA-4339-1 caused a build regression for the i386 builds. Updated packages are now available to address this issue. For reference, the original advisory text follows.
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-4339-2                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.debian.org/security/                     Salvatore Bonaccorso
    November 21, 2018                     https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : ceph
    Debian Bug     : 913909
    
    The update for ceph issued as DSA-4339-1 caused a build regression for
    the i386 builds. Updated packages are now available to address this
    issue. For reference, the original advisory text follows.
    
    Multiple vulnerabilities were discovered in Ceph, a distributed storage
    and file system: The cephx authentication protocol was susceptible to
    replay attacks and calculated signatures incorrectly, "ceph mon" did not
    validate capabilities for pool operations (resulting in potential
    corruption or deletion of snapshot images) and a format string
    vulnerability in libradosstriper could result in denial of service.
    
    For the stable distribution (stretch), this problem has been fixed in
    version 10.2.11-2.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your ceph packages.
    
    For the detailed security status of ceph please refer to its security
    tracker page at:
    https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/ceph
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"4","type":"x","order":"1","pct":57.14,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"2","type":"x","order":"2","pct":28.57,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"1","type":"x","order":"3","pct":14.29,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    Advisories

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.