Debian: DSA-4409-1: neutron security update

    Date18 Mar 2019
    CategoryDebian
    4065
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    Erik Olof Gunnar Andersson discovered that incorrect validation of port settings in the iptables security group driver of Neutron, the OpenStack virtual network service, could result in denial of service in a multi tenant setup.
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA512
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-4409-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.debian.org/security/                       Moritz Muehlenhoff
    March 18, 2019                        https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : neutron
    CVE ID         : CVE-2019-9735
    
    Erik Olof Gunnar Andersson discovered that incorrect validation of port
    settings in the iptables security group driver of Neutron, the OpenStack
    virtual network service, could result in denial of service in a multi
    tenant setup.
    
    For the stable distribution (stretch), this problem has been fixed in
    version 2:9.1.1-3+deb9u1.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your neutron packages.
    
    For the detailed security status of neutron please refer to
    its security tracker page at:
    https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/neutron
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"5","type":"x","order":"1","pct":62.5,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"2","type":"x","order":"2","pct":25,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"1","type":"x","order":"3","pct":12.5,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.