Debian: DSA-4433-1: ruby2.3 security update

    Date16 Apr 2019
    CategoryDebian
    9726
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    Several vulnerabilities have been discovered in the Rubygems included in the interpreter for the Ruby language, which may result in denial of service or the execution of arbitrary code.
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA512
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-4433-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.debian.org/security/                       Moritz Muehlenhoff
    April 16, 2019                        https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : ruby2.3
    CVE ID         : CVE-2019-8320 CVE-2019-8321 CVE-2019-8322 CVE-2019-8323 
                     CVE-2019-8324 CVE-2019-8325
    
    Several vulnerabilities have been discovered in the Rubygems included in
    the interpreter for the Ruby language, which may result in denial of
    service or the execution of arbitrary code.
    
    For the stable distribution (stretch), these problems have been fixed in
    version 2.3.3-1+deb9u6.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your ruby2.3 packages.
    
    For the detailed security status of ruby2.3 please refer to
    its security tracker page at:
    https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/ruby2.3
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"15","type":"x","order":"1","pct":53.57,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"4","type":"x","order":"2","pct":14.29,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"9","type":"x","order":"3","pct":32.14,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.