Debian: DSA-4436-1: imagemagick security update

    Date28 Apr 2019
    CategoryDebian
    6961
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    This update fixes two vulnerabilities in Imagemagick: Memory handling problems and missing or incomplete input sanitising may result in denial of service, memory disclosure or the execution of arbitrary code if malformed TIFF or Postscript files are processed.
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA512
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-4436-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.debian.org/security/                       Moritz Muehlenhoff
    April 28, 2019                        https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : imagemagick
    CVE ID         : CVE-2019-9956 CVE-2019-10650
    
    This update fixes two vulnerabilities in Imagemagick: Memory handling
    problems and missing or incomplete input sanitising may result in denial
    of service, memory disclosure or the execution of arbitrary code if
    malformed TIFF or Postscript files are processed.
          
    For the stable distribution (stretch), these problems have been fixed in
    version 8:6.9.7.4+dfsg-11+deb9u7.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your imagemagick packages.
    
    For the detailed security status of imagemagick please refer to
    its security tracker page at:
    https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/imagemagick
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"4","type":"x","order":"1","pct":57.14,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"2","type":"x","order":"2","pct":28.57,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"1","type":"x","order":"3","pct":14.29,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    Advisories

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.