Debian: DSA-4442-2: cups-filters regression update

    Date 13 May 2019
    4447
    Posted By LinuxSecurity Advisories
    The update for ghostscript released as DSA 4442-1 uncovered an issue in cups-filters which was using the undocumented Ghostscript internal "pdfdict" now hidden in the ghostscript update. Updated cups-filters packages are now available to correct this issue.
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-4442-2                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.debian.org/security/                     Salvatore Bonaccorso
    May 13, 2019                          https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : cups-filters
    Debian Bug     : 926576 928936 928952
    
    The update for ghostscript released as DSA 4442-1 uncovered an issue in
    cups-filters which was using the undocumented Ghostscript internal
    "pdfdict" now hidden in the ghostscript update. Updated cups-filters
    packages are now available to correct this issue.
    
    For the stable distribution (stretch), this problem has been fixed in
    version 1.11.6-3+deb9u1.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your cups-filters packages.
    
    For the detailed security status of cups-filters please refer to its
    security tracker page at:
    https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/cups-filters
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    How do you feel about the elimination of the terms 'blacklist' and 'slave' from the Linux kernel?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/32-how-do-you-feel-about-the-elimination-of-the-terms-blacklist-and-slave-from-the-linux-kernel?task=poll.vote&format=json
    32
    radio
    [{"id":"112","title":"I strongly support this change - racially charged language should not be used in the code and documentation of the kernel and other open-source projects.","votes":"3","type":"x","order":"1","pct":42.86,"resources":[]},{"id":"113","title":"I'm indifferent - this small change will not affect broader issues of racial insensitivity and white privilege.","votes":"2","type":"x","order":"2","pct":28.57,"resources":[]},{"id":"114","title":"I'm opposed to this change - there is no need to change language that has been used for years. It doesn't make sense for people to take offense to terminology used in community projects.","votes":"2","type":"x","order":"3","pct":28.57,"resources":[]}] ["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"] ["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"] 350
    bottom 200

    Please enable / Bitte aktiviere JavaScript!
    Veuillez activer / Por favor activa el Javascript![ ? ]

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.