Debian: DSA-4442-2: cups-filters regression update

    Date13 May 2019
    CategoryDebian
    4157
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    The update for ghostscript released as DSA 4442-1 uncovered an issue in cups-filters which was using the undocumented Ghostscript internal "pdfdict" now hidden in the ghostscript update. Updated cups-filters packages are now available to correct this issue.
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-4442-2                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.debian.org/security/                     Salvatore Bonaccorso
    May 13, 2019                          https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : cups-filters
    Debian Bug     : 926576 928936 928952
    
    The update for ghostscript released as DSA 4442-1 uncovered an issue in
    cups-filters which was using the undocumented Ghostscript internal
    "pdfdict" now hidden in the ghostscript update. Updated cups-filters
    packages are now available to correct this issue.
    
    For the stable distribution (stretch), this problem has been fixed in
    version 1.11.6-3+deb9u1.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your cups-filters packages.
    
    For the detailed security status of cups-filters please refer to its
    security tracker page at:
    https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/cups-filters
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    Do you read our distribution advisories on a regular basis?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /component/communitypolls/?task=poll.vote&format=json
    23
    radio
    [{"id":"84","title":"Yes, for a single distribution","votes":"0","type":"x","order":"1","pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":"85","title":"Yes, for multiple distributions","votes":"5","type":"x","order":"2","pct":62.5,"resources":[]},{"id":"86","title":"No","votes":"3","type":"x","order":"3","pct":37.5,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    Advisories

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.