Debian: DSA-4449-1: ffmpeg security update

    Date22 May 2019
    CategoryDebian
    6334
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    Several vulnerabilities have been discovered in the FFmpeg multimedia framework, which could result in denial of service or potentially the execution of arbitrary code if malformed files/streams are processed.
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA512
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-4449-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.debian.org/security/                       Moritz Muehlenhoff
    May 22, 2019                          https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : ffmpeg
    CVE ID         : CVE-2018-15822 CVE-2018-1999011 CVE-2019-9718
                     CVE-2019-11338
    
    Several vulnerabilities have been discovered in the FFmpeg multimedia
    framework, which could result in denial of service or potentially the
    execution of arbitrary code if malformed files/streams are processed.
    		      
    For the stable distribution (stretch), these problems have been fixed in
    version 7:3.2.14-1~deb9u1.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your ffmpeg packages.
    
    For the detailed security status of ffmpeg please refer to
    its security tracker page at:
    https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/ffmpeg
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"6","type":"x","order":"1","pct":60,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"3","type":"x","order":"2","pct":30,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"1","type":"x","order":"3","pct":10,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.