Debian: DSA-4476-1: python-django security update

    Date05 Jul 2019
    CategoryDebian
    6715
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    Three security issues were found in Django, a Python web development framework, which could result in denial of service, incomplete sanitisation of clickable links or missing redirects of HTTP requests to HTTPS.
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA512
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-4476-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.debian.org/security/                       Moritz Muehlenhoff
    July 05, 2019                         https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : python-django
    CVE ID         : CVE-2019-6975 CVE-2019-12308 CVE-2019-12781
    
    Three security issues were found in Django, a Python web development
    framework, which could result in denial of service, incomplete
    sanitisation of clickable links or missing redirects of HTTP requests
    to HTTPS.
    
    For the stable distribution (stretch), these problems have been fixed in
    version 1:1.10.7-2+deb9u5.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your python-django packages.
    
    For the detailed security status of python-django please refer to
    its security tracker page at:
    https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/python-django
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"14","type":"x","order":"1","pct":53.85,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"4","type":"x","order":"2","pct":15.38,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"8","type":"x","order":"3","pct":30.77,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.