Debian: DSA-4481-1: ruby-mini-magick security update

    Date13 Jul 2019
    CategoryDebian
    7411
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    Harsh Jaiswal discovered a remote shell execution vulnerability in ruby-mini-magick, a Ruby library providing a wrapper around ImageMagick or GraphicsMagick, exploitable when using MiniMagick::Image.open with specially crafted URLs coming from unsanitized user input.
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-4481-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.debian.org/security/                     Salvatore Bonaccorso
    July 13, 2019                         https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : ruby-mini-magick
    CVE ID         : CVE-2019-13574
    Debian Bug     : 931932
    
    Harsh Jaiswal discovered a remote shell execution vulnerability in
    ruby-mini-magick, a Ruby library providing a wrapper around ImageMagick
    or GraphicsMagick, exploitable when using MiniMagick::Image.open with
    specially crafted URLs coming from unsanitized user input.
    
    For the oldstable distribution (stretch), this problem has been fixed
    in version 4.5.1-1+deb9u1.
    
    For the stable distribution (buster), this problem has been fixed in
    version 4.9.2-1+deb10u1.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your ruby-mini-magick packages.
    
    For the detailed security status of ruby-mini-magick please refer to its
    security tracker page at:
    https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/ruby-mini-magick
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"25","type":"x","order":"1","pct":55.56,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"5","type":"x","order":"2","pct":11.11,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"15","type":"x","order":"3","pct":33.33,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.