Debian: DSA-4509-3: apache2 security update

    Date15 Oct 2019
    CategoryDebian
    522
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    It was reported that the apache2 update released as DSA 4509-1 incorrectly fixed CVE-2019-10092. Updated apache2 packages are now available to correct this issue. For reference, the relevant part of the original advisory text follows.
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-4509-3                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.debian.org/security/                     Salvatore Bonaccorso
    October 15, 2019                      https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : apache2
    CVE ID         : CVE-2019-10092
    Debian Bug     : 941202
    
    It was reported that the apache2 update released as DSA 4509-1
    incorrectly fixed CVE-2019-10092. Updated apache2 packages are now
    available to correct this issue. For reference, the relevant part of
    the original advisory text follows.
    
    CVE-2019-10092
    
        Matei "Mal" Badanoiu reported a limited cross-site scripting
        vulnerability in the mod_proxy error page.
    
    For the oldstable distribution (stretch), this problem has been fixed
    in version 2.4.25-3+deb9u9.
    
    For the stable distribution (buster), this problem has been fixed in
    version 2.4.38-3+deb10u3.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your apache2 packages.
    
    For the detailed security status of apache2 please refer to its security
    tracker page at:
    https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/apache2
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"64","type":"x","order":"1","pct":57.14,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"15","type":"x","order":"2","pct":13.39,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"33","type":"x","order":"3","pct":29.46,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.