Debian: DSA-4519-1: libreoffice security update

    Date08 Sep 2019
    CategoryDebian
    652
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    It was discovered that the code fixes for LibreOffice to address CVE-2019-9852 were not complete. Additional information can be found at https://www.libreoffice.org/about-us/security/advisories/CVE-2019-9854/
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA512
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-4519-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.debian.org/security/                       Moritz Muehlenhoff
    September 08, 2019                    https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : libreoffice
    CVE ID         : CVE-2019-9854
    
    It was discovered that the code fixes for LibreOffice to address
    CVE-2019-9852 were not complete. Additional information can be found at
    https://www.libreoffice.org/about-us/security/advisories/CVE-2019-9854/
    
    For the oldstable distribution (stretch), this problem has been fixed
    in version 1:5.2.7-1+deb9u11.
    
    For the stable distribution (buster), this problem has been fixed in
    version 1:6.1.5-3+deb10u4.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your libreoffice packages.
    
    For the detailed security status of libreoffice please refer to
    its security tracker page at:
    https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/libreoffice
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"13","type":"x","order":"1","pct":56.52,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"3","type":"x","order":"2","pct":13.04,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"7","type":"x","order":"3","pct":30.43,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.