Debian: DSA-4519-1: libreoffice security update

    Date 08 Sep 2019
    1197
    Posted By LinuxSecurity Advisories
    It was discovered that the code fixes for LibreOffice to address CVE-2019-9852 were not complete. Additional information can be found at https://www.libreoffice.org/about-us/security/advisories/CVE-2019-9854/
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA512
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-4519-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.debian.org/security/                       Moritz Muehlenhoff
    September 08, 2019                    https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : libreoffice
    CVE ID         : CVE-2019-9854
    
    It was discovered that the code fixes for LibreOffice to address
    CVE-2019-9852 were not complete. Additional information can be found at
    https://www.libreoffice.org/about-us/security/advisories/CVE-2019-9854/
    
    For the oldstable distribution (stretch), this problem has been fixed
    in version 1:5.2.7-1+deb9u11.
    
    For the stable distribution (buster), this problem has been fixed in
    version 1:6.1.5-3+deb10u4.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your libreoffice packages.
    
    For the detailed security status of libreoffice please refer to
    its security tracker page at:
    https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/libreoffice
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    How do you feel about the elimination of the terms 'blacklist' and 'slave' from the Linux kernel?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/32-how-do-you-feel-about-the-elimination-of-the-terms-blacklist-and-slave-from-the-linux-kernel?task=poll.vote&format=json
    32
    radio
    [{"id":"112","title":"I strongly support this change - racially charged language should not be used in the code and documentation of the kernel and other open-source projects.","votes":"3","type":"x","order":"1","pct":42.86,"resources":[]},{"id":"113","title":"I'm indifferent - this small change will not affect broader issues of racial insensitivity and white privilege.","votes":"2","type":"x","order":"2","pct":28.57,"resources":[]},{"id":"114","title":"I'm opposed to this change - there is no need to change language that has been used for years. It doesn't make sense for people to take offense to terminology used in community projects.","votes":"2","type":"x","order":"3","pct":28.57,"resources":[]}] ["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"] ["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"] 350
    bottom 200

    Please enable / Bitte aktiviere JavaScript!
    Veuillez activer / Por favor activa el Javascript![ ? ]

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.