Debian: DSA-4526-1: opendmarc security update

    Date19 Sep 2019
    CategoryDebian
    268
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    It was discovered that OpenDMARC, a milter implementation of DMARC, is prone to a signature-bypass vulnerability with multiple From: addresses. For the oldstable distribution (stretch), this problem has been fixed
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-4526-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.debian.org/security/                     Salvatore Bonaccorso
    September 19, 2019                    https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : opendmarc
    CVE ID         : CVE-2019-16378
    Debian Bug     : 940081
    
    It was discovered that OpenDMARC, a milter implementation of DMARC, is
    prone to a signature-bypass vulnerability with multiple From: addresses.
    
    For the oldstable distribution (stretch), this problem has been fixed
    in version 1.3.2-2+deb9u2.
    
    For the stable distribution (buster), this problem has been fixed in
    version 1.3.2-6+deb10u1.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your opendmarc packages.
    
    For the detailed security status of opendmarc please refer to its
    security tracker page at:
    https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/opendmarc
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"22","type":"x","order":"1","pct":55,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"5","type":"x","order":"2","pct":12.5,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"13","type":"x","order":"3","pct":32.5,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.