Debian: DSA-4551-1: golang-1.11 security update

    Date25 Oct 2019
    CategoryDebian
    892
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    Daniel Mandragona discovered that invalid DSA public keys can cause a panic in dsa.Verify(), resulting in denial of service. For the stable distribution (buster), this problem has been fixed in
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA512
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-4551-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.debian.org/security/                       Moritz Muehlenhoff
    October 25, 2019                      https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : golang-1.11
    CVE ID         : CVE-2019-17596
    
    Daniel Mandragona discovered that invalid DSA public keys can cause a
    panic in dsa.Verify(), resulting in denial of service.
    
    For the stable distribution (buster), this problem has been fixed in
    version 1.11.6-1+deb10u3.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your golang-1.11 packages.
    
    For the detailed security status of golang-1.11 please refer to
    its security tracker page at:
    https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/golang-1.11
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"66","type":"x","order":"1","pct":57.39,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"15","type":"x","order":"2","pct":13.04,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"34","type":"x","order":"3","pct":29.57,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.