Debian: DSA-4560-1: simplesamlphp security update

    Date06 Nov 2019
    CategoryDebian
    136
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    Debian Large
    It was discovered that in SimpleSAMLphp, an implementation of the SAML 2.0 protocol, it was possible to circumvent XML signature verification on SAML messages.
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-4560-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.debian.org/security/                          Thijs Kinkhorst
    November 06, 2019                     https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : simplesamlphp
    CVE ID         : CVE-2019-3465
    Debian Bug     : 944107
    
    It was discovered that in SimpleSAMLphp, an implementation of the
    SAML 2.0 protocol, it was possible to circumvent XML signature
    verification on SAML messages.
    
    For the oldstable distribution (stretch), this problem has been fixed
    in version 1.14.11-1+deb9u2.
    
    For the stable distribution (buster), this problem has been fixed in
    version 1.16.3-1+deb10u1.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your simplesamlphp packages.
    
    For the detailed security status of simplesamlphp please refer to
    its security tracker page at:
    https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/simplesamlphp
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"39","type":"x","order":"1","pct":50.65,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"11","type":"x","order":"2","pct":14.29,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"27","type":"x","order":"3","pct":35.06,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.