Debian: DSA-4567-1: dpdk security update

    Date12 Nov 2019
    CategoryDebian
    234
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    It was discovered that the vhost PMD in DPDK, a set of libraries for fast packet processing, was affected by memory and file descriptor leaks which could result in denial of service.
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA512
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-4567-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.debian.org/security/                       Moritz Muehlenhoff
    November 12, 2019                     https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : dpdk
    CVE ID         : CVE-2019-14818
    
    It was discovered that the vhost PMD in DPDK, a set of libraries for
    fast packet processing, was affected by memory and file descriptor leaks
    which could result in denial of service.
    
    For the oldstable distribution (stretch), this problem has been fixed
    in version 16.11.9-1+deb9u2.
    
    For the stable distribution (buster), this problem has been fixed in
    version 18.11.2-2+deb10u2.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your dpdk packages.
    
    For the detailed security status of dpdk please refer to
    its security tracker page at:
    https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/dpdk
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"65","type":"x","order":"1","pct":57.52,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"15","type":"x","order":"2","pct":13.27,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"33","type":"x","order":"3","pct":29.2,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.