Debian: DSA-4568-1: postgresql-common security update

    Date 14 Nov 2019
    444
    Posted By LinuxSecurity Advisories
    Rich Mirch discovered that the pg_ctlcluster script didn't drop privileges when creating socket/statistics temporary directories, which could result in local privilege escalation.
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA512
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-4568-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.debian.org/security/                       Moritz Muehlenhoff
    November 14, 2019                     https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : postgresql-common
    CVE ID         : CVE-2019-3466
    
    Rich Mirch discovered that the pg_ctlcluster script didn't drop
    privileges when creating socket/statistics temporary directories, which
    could result in local privilege escalation.
    
    For the oldstable distribution (stretch), this problem has been fixed
    in version 181+deb9u3.
    
    For the stable distribution (buster), this problem has been fixed in
    version 200+deb10u3.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your postgresql-common packages.
    
    For the detailed security status of postgresql-common please refer to
    its security tracker page at:
    https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/postgresql-common
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    Do you feel that the Lawful Access to Encrypted Data Act, which aims to force encryption backdoors, is a threat to US citizens' privacy?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/30-do-you-feel-that-the-lawful-access-to-encrypted-data-act-which-aims-to-force-encryption-backdoors-is-a-threat-to-privacy?task=poll.vote&format=json
    30
    radio
    [{"id":"106","title":"Yes - I am a privacy advocate and I am strongly opposed to this bill.","votes":"23","type":"x","order":"1","pct":95.83,"resources":[]},{"id":"107","title":"I'm undecided - it has its pros and cons.","votes":"1","type":"x","order":"2","pct":4.17,"resources":[]},{"id":"108","title":"No - I support this bill and feel that it will help protect against crime and threats to our national security. ","votes":"0","type":"x","order":"3","pct":0,"resources":[]}] ["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"] ["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"] 350
    bottom 200

    Advisories

    Please enable / Bitte aktiviere JavaScript!
    Veuillez activer / Por favor activa el Javascript![ ? ]

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.