Debian: DSA-4577-1: haproxy security update

    Date 27 Nov 2019
    959
    Posted By LinuxSecurity Advisories
    Tim Düsterhus discovered that haproxy, a TCP/HTTP reverse proxy, did not properly sanitize HTTP headers when converting from HTTP/2 to HTTP/1. This would allow a remote user to perform CRLF injections.
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA512
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-4577-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.debian.org/security/                       Sebastien Delafond
    November 28, 2019                     https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : haproxy
    CVE ID         : CVE-2019-19330
    
    Tim Düsterhus discovered that haproxy, a TCP/HTTP reverse proxy, did
    not properly sanitize HTTP headers when converting from HTTP/2 to
    HTTP/1. This would allow a remote user to perform CRLF injections.
    
    For the stable distribution (buster), this problem has been fixed in
    version 1.8.19-1+deb10u1.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your haproxy packages.
    
    For the detailed security status of haproxy please refer to
    its security tracker page at:
    https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/haproxy
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    Do you feel that the Lawful Access to Encrypted Data Act, which aims to force encryption backdoors, is a threat to US citizens' privacy?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/30-do-you-feel-that-the-lawful-access-to-encrypted-data-act-which-aims-to-force-encryption-backdoors-is-a-threat-to-privacy?task=poll.vote&format=json
    30
    radio
    [{"id":"106","title":"Yes - I am a privacy advocate and I am strongly opposed to this bill.","votes":"23","type":"x","order":"1","pct":95.83,"resources":[]},{"id":"107","title":"I'm undecided - it has its pros and cons.","votes":"1","type":"x","order":"2","pct":4.17,"resources":[]},{"id":"108","title":"No - I support this bill and feel that it will help protect against crime and threats to our national security. ","votes":"0","type":"x","order":"3","pct":0,"resources":[]}] ["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"] ["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"] 350
    bottom 200

    Advisories

    Please enable / Bitte aktiviere JavaScript!
    Veuillez activer / Por favor activa el Javascript![ ? ]

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.