Debian: Info: Phasing out support for 2.1

    Date15 Sep 2000
    CategoryDebian
    2639
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    Debian is phasing out support for Debian 2.1 (slink) and are looking for feedback.
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    
    - ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory                             This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. 
    http://www.debian.org/security/                            Michael Stone
    September 21, 2000
    - ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Debian is phasing out support for Debian 2.1 (slink). We believe that
    this will have a minimal impact on our user community as we expect that
    most slink users have already upgraded to potato. We had originally
    announced that support would end Sep 30, 2000. In response to feedback
    to our earlier announcement we have decided to continue support through
    30 Oct, 2000. This will include packages for m68k and i386 only, for
    the most severe security problems. There will be no further support for
    the sparc and alpha platforms; sparc and alpha users should upgrade to
    Debian 2.2 (potato) immediately.
    
    We value your input during this transitional phase. Please direct your
    comments to This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
    Version: 2.6.3ia
    Charset: noconv
    
    iQCVAwUBOcn7mA0hVr09l8FJAQE0sAQAuLJX5oAGIwqP0yV2kY8/ub8DlfmtwgQF
    9tCAfynt31JXJlEm4do4NsFeYPOnqJJOVgfT6Nj4IqFa7EEQZQIVSjP61gkTe/8/
    IZfsEXcx/k+TKOb73JYwRH48shae3b56PCZ+PsVG4ks28LLxqoZ59SoqK6O8tvih
    pSWWx/dSIiU=
    =/3gW
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"67","type":"x","order":"1","pct":57.26,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"16","type":"x","order":"2","pct":13.68,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"34","type":"x","order":"3","pct":29.06,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.