Updated i386 package for sendmail

    Date13 Dec 1999
    CategoryDebian
    2974
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    The version of sendmail that was listed in the earlier advisory today was compiled with the wrong version of libc. This has been corrected in version 8.9.3-3slink1.0.1 .
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    
    - ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory                             This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    http://www.debian.org/security/      
                       Wichert Akkerman
    December  7, 1999
    - ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    The version of sendmail that was listed in the earlier advisory
    today was compiled with the wrong version of libc. This has been
    corrected in version 8.9.3-3slink1.0.1 .
    
    wget url
            will fetch the file for you
    dpkg -i file.deb
            will install the referenced file.
    
    
      Intel ia32 architecture:
        http://security.debian.org/dists/stable/updates/binary-
    i386/sendmail_8.9.3-3slink1.0.1_i386.deb
          MD5 checksum: c3379317e496f1d85f520a670f29fb1a
    
    
      This file will be moved into
      ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/dists/stable/*/binary-$arch/ soon.
    
    
    - -- 
    - ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    For apt-get: deb http://security.debian.org/ stable 
    updates
    For dpkg-ftp: ftp://security.debian.org/debian-security dists/stable/updates
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
    Version: 2.6.3ia
    Charset: noconv
    
    iQB1AwUBOE0c0KjZR/ntlUftAQE2TAL/dbmq0zUurTYM4CYVnJl+2jNg5Wuu33QR
    IELIeDWZfNKtpLx+WH2JnOcS8IbjGBMGl7bI8p1ZRuhKhRnB8b2XOfH9WFQUZVN/
    k1esLcpDK8ChK3J1dEZ3S+wmD4VEb3Zq
    =mvYv
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
    
    

    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"39","type":"x","order":"1","pct":50,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"11","type":"x","order":"2","pct":14.1,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"28","type":"x","order":"3","pct":35.9,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.