Debian LTS: DLA-1968-1: imagemagick security update

    Date21 Oct 2019
    CategoryDebian LTS
    304
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    Debianlts Large
    Multiple vulnerabilities have been found in imagemagick, an image processing toolkit. CVE-2019-11470
    
    Package        : imagemagick
    Version        : 8:6.8.9.9-5+deb8u18
    CVE ID         : CVE-2019-11470 CVE-2019-14981 CVE-2019-15139 CVE-2019-15140
    
    Multiple vulnerabilities have been found in imagemagick, an image processing
    toolkit.
    
    CVE-2019-11470
    
        Uncontrolled resource consumption caused by insufficiently sanitized image
        size in ReadCINImage (coders/cin.c). This vulnerability might be leveraged
        by remote attackers to cause denial of service via a crafted Cineon image.
    
    CVE-2019-14981
    
        Divide-by-zero vulnerability in MeanShiftImage (magick/feature.c). This
        vulnerability might be leveraged by remote attackers to cause denial of
        service via crafted image data.
    
    CVE-2019-15139
    
        Out-of-bounds read in ReadXWDImage (coders/xwd.c). This vulnerability might
        be leveraged by remote attackers to cause denial of service via a crafted
        XWD (X Window System window dumping file) image file.
    
    CVE-2019-15140
    
        Bound checking issue in ReadMATImage (coders/mat.c), potentially leading to
        use-after-free. This vulnerability might be leveraged by remote attackers to
        cause denial of service or any other unspecified impact via a crafted MAT
        image file.
    
    For Debian 8 "Jessie", these problems have been fixed in version
    8:6.8.9.9-5+deb8u18.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your imagemagick packages.
    
    Further information about Debian LTS security advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://wiki.debian.org/LTS
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"36","type":"x","order":"1","pct":50.7,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"10","type":"x","order":"2","pct":14.08,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"25","type":"x","order":"3","pct":35.21,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.