Fedora 28: pacemaker Security Update

    Date 03 May 2019
    563
    Posted By LinuxSecurity Advisories
    Security fix for CVE-2019-3885, CVE-2018-16877, CVE-2018-16878
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Fedora Update Notification
    FEDORA-2019-e71f6f36ac
    2019-05-04 01:16:59.061696
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Name        : pacemaker
    Product     : Fedora 28
    Version     : 1.1.18
    Release     : 3.fc28
    URL         : https://www.clusterlabs.org
    Summary     : Scalable High-Availability cluster resource manager
    Description :
    Pacemaker is an advanced, scalable High-Availability cluster resource
    manager for Corosync, CMAN and/or Linux-HA.
    
    It supports more than 16 node clusters with significant capabilities
    for managing resources and dependencies.
    
    It will run scripts at initialization, when machines go up or down,
    when related resources fail and can be configured to periodically check
    resource health.
    
    Available rpmbuild rebuild options:
      --with(out) : coverage doc hardening pre_release profiling
    
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Update Information:
    
    Security fix for CVE-2019-3885, CVE-2018-16877, CVE-2018-16878
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    ChangeLog:
    
    * Thu Apr 25 2019 Fedora Release Engineering  - 1.1.18-3
    - Apply fixes for security issues:
      . CVE-2019-3885 (use-after-free with potential information disclosure)
      . CVE-2018-16877 (insufficient local IPC client-server authentication)
      . CVE-2018-16878 (insufficient verification inflicted preference of
                        uncontrolled processes)
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    References:
    
      [ 1 ] Bug #1652646 - CVE-2018-16877 pacemaker: Insufficient local IPC client-server authentication on the client's side can lead to local privesc
            https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1652646
      [ 2 ] Bug #1657962 - CVE-2018-16878 pacemaker: Insufficient verification inflicted preference of uncontrolled processes can lead to DoS
            https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1657962
      [ 3 ] Bug #1694554 - CVE-2019-3885 pacemaker: Information disclosure through use-after-free
            https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694554
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    This update can be installed with the "dnf" update program. Use
    su -c 'dnf upgrade --advisory FEDORA-2019-e71f6f36ac' at the command
    line. For more information, refer to the dnf documentation available at
    https://dnf.readthedocs.io/en/latest/command_ref.html#upgrade-command-label
    
    All packages are signed with the Fedora Project GPG key. More details on the
    GPG keys used by the Fedora Project can be found at
    https://fedoraproject.org/keys
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    _______________________________________________
    package-announce mailing list -- This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    To unsubscribe send an email to This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
    List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
    List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    If you are using full-disk encryption: are you concerned about the resulting performance hit?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 2 answer(s).
    /main-polls/34-if-you-are-using-full-disk-encryption-are-you-concerned-about-the-resulting-performance-hit?task=poll.vote&format=json
    34
    radio
    [{"id":"120","title":"Yes","votes":"14","type":"x","order":"1","pct":60.87,"resources":[]},{"id":"121","title":"No ","votes":"9","type":"x","order":"2","pct":39.13,"resources":[]}] ["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"] ["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"] 350
    bottom 200

    Please enable / Bitte aktiviere JavaScript!
    Veuillez activer / Por favor activa el Javascript![ ? ]

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.