Fedora 29: mgetty FEDORA-2019-732b5488c2

    Date18 Aug 2019
    CategoryFedora
    364
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    Security fix for CVE-2019-1010189
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Fedora Update Notification
    FEDORA-2019-732b5488c2
    2019-08-19 02:28:49.021416
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Name        : mgetty
    Product     : Fedora 29
    Version     : 1.2.1
    Release     : 6.fc29
    URL         : http://mgetty.greenie.net/
    Summary     : A getty replacement for use with data and fax modems
    Description :
    The mgetty package contains a "smart" getty which allows logins over a
    serial line (i.e., through a modem). If you're using a Class 2 or 2.0
    modem, mgetty can receive faxes. If you also need to send faxes,
    you'll need to install the sendfax program.
    
    If you'll be dialing in to your system using a modem, you should
    install the mgetty package. If you'd like to send faxes using mgetty
    and your modem, you'll need to install the mgetty-sendfax program. If
    you need a viewer for faxes, you'll also need to install the
    mgetty-viewfax package.
    
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Update Information:
    
    Security fix for CVE-2019-1010189
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    ChangeLog:
    
    * Thu Jul 25 2019 Fedora Release Engineering  - 1.2.1-6
    - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_31_Mass_Rebuild
    * Mon Jun  3 2019 Zdenek Dohnal  - 1.2.1-5
    - 1716409 - mgetty: %systemd_postun scriptlets need service files as an argument
    * Tue Mar 26 2019 Zdenek Dohnal  - 1.2.1-4
    - add faxrunqd.service unit file (#1636433)
    * Tue Mar 26 2019 Zdenek Dohnal  - 1.2.1-3
    - adding license file
    * Fri Mar  8 2019 Tim Landscheidt  - 1.2.1-2
    - Fix requirement for %postun (instead of %preun) scriptlet
    * Tue Feb 12 2019 Tomas Korbar  - 1.2.1-1
    - Rebase to 1.2.1
    - Resolve #1628754 #1628755 #1629971 #1629972
    - Resolve #1629973 #1629974 #1629975 #1629976
    - Resolve #1629979 #1629980 #1629981 #1629983
    - Resolve #1629985 #1629986
    * Fri Feb  1 2019 Fedora Release Engineering  - 1.1.37-9
    - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_30_Mass_Rebuild
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    References:
    
      [ 1 ] Bug #1739373 - CVE-2019-1010189 mgetty: opening a specially crafted file leads to an infinite loop and DoS
            https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1739373
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    This update can be installed with the "dnf" update program. Use
    su -c 'dnf upgrade --advisory FEDORA-2019-732b5488c2' at the command
    line. For more information, refer to the dnf documentation available at
    http://dnf.readthedocs.io/en/latest/command_ref.html#upgrade-command-label
    
    All packages are signed with the Fedora Project GPG key. More details on the
    GPG keys used by the Fedora Project can be found at
    https://fedoraproject.org/keys
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    _______________________________________________
    package-announce mailing list -- This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    To unsubscribe send an email to This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
    List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
    List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"13","type":"x","order":"1","pct":56.52,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"3","type":"x","order":"2","pct":13.04,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"7","type":"x","order":"3","pct":30.43,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.