Fedora 31: radare2 FEDORA-2020-acd8cdb08d

    Date 13 Feb 2020
    608
    Posted By LinuxSecurity Advisories
    Rebase to radare2-4.2.1 and cutter-re 1.10.1. It fixes CVE-2019-19590 and CVE-2019-19547. It also fix a problem in cutter-re that did not display the window icon on Wayland.
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Fedora Update Notification
    FEDORA-2020-acd8cdb08d
    2020-02-14 01:42:14.814326
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Name        : radare2
    Product     : Fedora 31
    Version     : 4.2.1
    Release     : 2.fc31
    URL         : https://radare.org/
    Summary     : The reverse engineering framework
    Description :
    The radare2 is a reverse-engineering framework that is multi-architecture,
    multi-platform, and highly scriptable.  Radare2 provides a hexadecimal
    editor, wrapped I/O, file system support, debugger support, diffing
    between two functions or binaries, and code analysis at opcode,
    basic block, and function levels.
    
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Update Information:
    
    Rebase to radare2-4.2.1 and cutter-re 1.10.1. It fixes CVE-2019-19590 and
    CVE-2019-19547. It also fix a problem in cutter-re that did not display the
    window icon on Wayland.
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    ChangeLog:
    
    * Wed Feb  5 2020 Riccardo Schirone  - 4.2.1-2
    - Rebuild for new cutter
    * Mon Feb  3 2020 Riccardo Schirone  - 4.2.1-1
    - Rebase to upstream version 4.2.1
    - Fix CVE-2019-19647
    - Fix CVE-2019-19590
    * Thu Jan 30 2020 Fedora Release Engineering  - 3.9.0-3.2
    - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_32_Mass_Rebuild
    * Mon Oct  7 2019 Riccardo Schirone  - 3.9.0-3.1
    - Fix epel7 build
    * Fri Oct  4 2019 Ivan Mironov  - 3.9.0-2.1
    - Add missing BuildRequires: xxhash-devel, openssl-devel
    - Add missing Requires for -devel package: file-devel, openssl-devel
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    References:
    
      [ 1 ] Bug #1795157 - CVE-2019-19590 radare2: integer overflow in for the variable new_token_size in the function r_asm_massemble at libr/asm/asm.c [fedora-all]
            https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1795157
      [ 2 ] Bug #1783453 - CVE-2019-19647 radare2: improper variable validation in r_asm_pseudo_incbin in libr/asm/asm.c leads to DoS [fedora-all]
            https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1783453
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    This update can be installed with the "dnf" update program. Use
    su -c 'dnf upgrade --advisory FEDORA-2020-acd8cdb08d' at the command
    line. For more information, refer to the dnf documentation available at
    https://dnf.readthedocs.io/en/latest/command_ref.html#upgrade-command-label
    
    All packages are signed with the Fedora Project GPG key. More details on the
    GPG keys used by the Fedora Project can be found at
    https://fedoraproject.org/keys
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    _______________________________________________
    package-announce mailing list -- This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    To unsubscribe send an email to This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
    List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
    List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    Do you feel that the Lawful Access to Encrypted Data Act, which aims to force encryption backdoors, is a threat to US citizens' privacy?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/30-do-you-feel-that-the-lawful-access-to-encrypted-data-act-which-aims-to-force-encryption-backdoors-is-a-threat-to-privacy?task=poll.vote&format=json
    30
    radio
    [{"id":"106","title":"Yes - I am a privacy advocate and I am strongly opposed to this bill.","votes":"23","type":"x","order":"1","pct":95.83,"resources":[]},{"id":"107","title":"I'm undecided - it has its pros and cons.","votes":"1","type":"x","order":"2","pct":4.17,"resources":[]},{"id":"108","title":"No - I support this bill and feel that it will help protect against crime and threats to our national security. ","votes":"0","type":"x","order":"3","pct":0,"resources":[]}] ["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"] ["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"] 350
    bottom 200

    Advisories

    Please enable / Bitte aktiviere JavaScript!
    Veuillez activer / Por favor activa el Javascript![ ? ]

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.